< Church is a network |
Index |
Groups of six to twenty >Groups of just two or three have benefits and limitations. They are the smallest possible forms of church life and may develop spontaneously. They are powerful in communicating.Last time we saw that there's only one church and it consists of a web of rich, multiple connections. At the smaller, local scale we are typically involved mostly with a particular group of some size.
If you are part of a larger church group I strongly recommend you also consider meeting regularly on a much smaller scale with no more than one or two others. If this is new to you, you'll find the dynamics and depth of sharing completely different.
The new partner (or partners) don't need to come from your larger circle such as a cell group or local congregation. In many ways it's better if they don't. If you are a Baptist why not meet with an Anglican and someone from a home church? All of you will broaden your horizons. Information will begin to flow through you between those larger groups which might otherwise have little or no interaction. These are significant benefits.
Another advantage of such small groups is that it's possible to meet daily. If you choose to try this you might like to keep the meetings very brief.
Church of Two (CO2) is one suitable pattern for groups of two or three and requires about five minutes per person.
There's really only one important requirement, and it's this - the people in your group of two or three must be friends. Either you will start meeting with an existing friend or two, or you will need to
become good friends.
What happens if a fourth person wants to join, or a fifth or sixth? The level of intimacy is eroded and the dynamics of the group will change. But there's a very simple way to avoid this. Instead of creating a group of four, one of the original three can help the newcomer by forming another group of two. When a third member is added, the helper returns to their original group. Alternatively the helper might become temporarily or permanently part of
both groups.
Groups of two or three often form naturally. Let me tell you a story from my own life.
Ten or eleven years ago I began meeting at home with my sister and one or two other friends. Sometimes there would be just two of us, other times as many as six or seven. Gradually, as others joined us, we began to meet as two separate groups in different towns as this reduced our travelling needs.
Later, I was temporarily part of a small evangelical fellowship that was considering its future. In the end the decision was made to close down. As a result of meeting with them I became friendly with Jim. Jim invited me to his home where he was regularly meeting with Sean one evening each week, we would chat about life, read and discuss the Bible, and pray together. We still meet like this, we are church expressed as a group of three men. A while later, Jim joined
River Church in the town, but the three of us continued meeting as before.
I have also been meeting with Paul and Roger once a week during the daytime. at first for
CO2, these days more for Bible study. And I meet regularly with Sean, just the two of us. We have focussed at different times on hearing the Lord, outreach, and much more.
A couple of years ago I began going along to my wife's small group, part of
Open Door. I'm not a member of Open Door but I'm very involved with the small group, it currently has around a dozen people each week.
Because I am part of all these groups I have connections through them to Open Door, River Church and more. I enjoy meeting in all these ways but the deepest and most intimate times are usually with the very small groups - just two or three.
Here are some questions
- How well connected are you within your church?
- How well connected are you with people in other churches?
- What differences do you see between connecting individuals and connecting churches?
Please leave a comment below.
< Church is a network |
Index |
Groups of six to twenty >